academic failure endemic to a prospering economy

you’re a farmer. you’re the only farmer in a country with 100 citizens, including yourself. you are extremely efficient. you are 100% efficient. you make a lot of money as a farmer because the demand is exactly equal to supply. you can charge absolutely whatever you want. and you do.

the countryfolk try everything to steal your secrets, but you all live in a nation with dead soil. you have the secret knowledge that it takes to farm in this dead soil. you have no competition. until some innovation or thievery happens, this monopoly will continue.

one day, ten children are born. their mothers and fathers provide food for them out of their own allotment until the children are 10 years old. but suddenly efficiency is down by about 10% and you have 30 hungry people in your country (the mother of each child, the father of each child and each child itself).

you are a moral farmer. you are an ethical farmer. you are a good farmer. you are a smart farmer. you offer to increase productivity by teaching one extra child to grow food.

the child studies for 10 years. at the end of those 10 years, that child is 100% efficient at growing crops. the population is now 110, and overall food production is now 82% higher.

the child goes out on his own and becomes a farmer. there are now two farmers in the nation.

suddenly, your income as a farmer drops by nearly 50%. you do some quick analysis and realize that the child is not only selling all of his food, but the market value has dropped by nearly half and he has undercut you by a small percentage.

you cannot change past events, but you can influence future events. you are now in a moral quandary, so you weigh all your options, ethical or not.

what are your options?

  • murder the child and allow hunger to resume
  • murder the child and 9 other people in the nation
  • exile the child and 9 other people
  • kill yourself and 9 other people
  • take the hit to your income, make a back door financial deal with the child and live a more modest life
  • teach another child to farm at 100% efficiency to disrupt the system
  • optimize efficiency, drive the child out of business and corner the market
  • enslave the child and stop working 90% of the time
  • become an theocratic/autocratic/idealist leader, enslave the population and make them all collective farmers
  • encourage people to breed like rats so that the population increases to 200 and demand catches up with supply
  • kill the child, teach 9 new people to farm, enforce a way to limit their farming ability to 1% efficiency
  • develop a technocracy, imprison the physical population in virtual version of plato’s cave, provide them subsistence and allow only those who can solve intellectual puzzles to earn better subsistence and reproduce

well? which of these economic systems suits you best? which economic system are we in now? which of these systems hasn’t been implemented in the last 10K years?

all trick questions, dummy!

this is the one we live (aka, simplified, present-day capitalism): corner and dominate the market through a rigged educational system. teach 6 stupid children to farm badly for free, teach 2 middling children to farm decently well for tuition, teach 1 gifted child to farm well for free as a student on scholarship, stop teaching, invest in all of their farms, watch most of them fail as farmers and some of them retrain in new industries, collect rents & interest such that you get large sums of passive income for the rest of your life, all the while slowly passing your arcane knowledge of finance on to the only gifted student (who should also be your son), hiring 6 of the failed farmers to build your secluded mansion on the beach, hiring one of the failed farmers to be your butler, another your cook, another your maid (“side pussy”), one to be your sex slave (“wife”) and finally retire in comfort and decadence.

it pays to construct an educational system that encourages failure. economic ruin comes to nations whose educational system is overly functional. did you think this country would get away with it forever? no, my friend! we are quickly running out of women, chinese, indians (dot and feather!), blacks, mexicans, developing nations and third world countries to exploit!

the five domains of structure

hmm. the fifth domain. the final domain. there seem to be five domains, if you’re counting using the real number system. imaginary numbers include the square root of negative and infinity. is null or nought an imaginary number? it seems easy to prove that null is not zero, and zero is a real number. so is the null domain a countable domain? are there six domains or is the null domain not countable leaving five domains? is the fifth domain infinity? is the null domain the square root or negative one? is something always built on a foundation of nothing? is it a fundamental paradox? is the 1st domain the smallest domain we can count? mathematics does not seem as well suited to analyzing the universe as it first seems to be. otherwise the singularity wouldn’t exist. the singularity seems to be the null domain. even stephen hawking refused to analyze the singularity. he needed a different domain of mathematics to explain it. does mathematics have a null domain? a place where it doesn’t work? yes. that seems clear. that’s the paradox. the null domain defies explanation and defies counting. yet somehow, it doesn’t exist and yet everything is built upon it. einstein seems like he gave up. he called it god in the end. stephen hawking seems like he gave up, but maybe he didn’t. maybe he just died before he gave an answer. i accept that he accepted imaginary numbers. i accept that he also accept that null is an imaginary number, domain structure, uncountable though it may be.

you aren’t like a nazi. you are a nazi.

straight up. you are brainwashed. what happened to you is exactly what happened to the german populace in the 1930’s. you’re a fucking nazi. you think you’re saving people because your social media bubble and your search bias and your dozens of other cognitive biases tell you that you are a good person. your system of cognitive biases tell you you’re a good person. but you’re not. helping people — saving people — enlightening people — you’re doing nothing of the sort. you’re pumping money into the machine that is feeding you exactly what you want to hear, and what you want to hear is whatever your dopamine feedback loop demands. you feel like an individual. you feel free. you feel like you’re making choices. that’s what your religion told you. that’s what your god told you. that’s what your facebook timeline told you. but no. you are none of those happy shiny people you believe in. the wool has been pulled down so far, your feet are cozy and toasty. your sock starts at your head. your head is in the sand. you are ignorant. you are a killer. you are a man slaughterer. you are a murderer. you are the cog in the genocidal machine. you are a nazi. you claim to be a democrat. you claim to be a republican. you claim to be enlightened. you are a sheep. you are sheeple. you are a cow. you are milk. you are meat. you are the bite of the mosquito. you are the numbing agent. you are numb. you are comfortably numb. you are blood in the belly. you are gasoline. you are combustible fuel. you are a forest fire. you are brainwashed. straight up. you are a nazi.

goddamn profit’s falling!!!!

gdp. gross domestic product. uncle fucker. ouch. long recovery guaranteed. motherfucking money, meet ass eating toilet. these idiots don’t understand how much their cost to live skyrocketed … standard of living dropped by 33 percent this quarter alone … “not as bad as the great depression” my ass. you dug a 25 year hole, assholes.